It has been frustrating to me over the years to have reviewed thousands of wines and such a small percentage of them are remarkable. That is they stand out from all the others. This evening I reviewed anb $8 Cabernet Sauvignon from Paso Robles California. It was drinkable, it was worth the $8 but if I had to identify this wine in a blind tasting I would not be able to tell you what I was drinking.
I suppose you could assert, "You have a bad palate..." I am getting up there in years I admit but the issue is really that when all you ever drink are the $10 price point wines, while there are a handful of standouts here and there, for the most part they all rather taste the same broadly speaking.
Sure you can tell a Pinot Noir from a Zinfandel, a Chardonnay from a Sauvignon Blanc but that is about as far as you can go. The price point of the wine is where you separate the exquisite from the mundane; the distinctive from the ho hum everyday varietal.
Since I stopped monetizing my blog (many years ago) I have to be realistic about how much I pay for a wine. I am after all retired... And the point here is that inexpensive wines are inexpensive precisely because they are mundane, ho hum, and predictable.
Meaning "these" are NOT the kind of wines you sit down to with the bottle hidden from you and you try and guess the grape, the vintage, the part of the world they came from and the maker.
So all this is to say, with rare exception, pay more attention to my final judgement on every wine. Basically, "Would I buy it again?" Is it worth what I paid for it? Which is to say pay attention to the "Raise a glass" tag on put on the wines I taste if they are worth the money and and worth buying again.
Stay tuned for Christmas wine suggestions!